Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council counsel urges caution; committee postpones general-plan amendment bill to Nov. 7
Summary
Deputy corporation counsel presented legislative history and warned that amendments to the general plan must be coordinated with charter and planning commissions; Committee postponed Bill 1 81 to Nov. 7 to refine timing and process language.
The committee paused substantive action on Bill 1 81, which would amend procedures for general-plan amendments, after a long briefing by Deputy Corporation Counsel Elizabeth Strantz and extended discussion among council members and planning staff.
Strantz summarized decades of legislative history and told the committee that the general plan is a unique regulatory instrument whose amendment process must be aligned with county charter provisions and planning-commission review. Council members asked for clearer definitions of "interim" versus "comprehensive" amendments and expressed differing views on how much authority the council should reserve when the new general plan comes before it.
The committee voted to postpone Bill 1 81 to the November 7 committee meeting to allow corporation counsel, planning staff, and legislators to reconcile procedural language and propose clarified code placement for amendment procedures.
