Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Grants topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County staff detail three CJCC grants for family treatment, chance and DUI courts

Douglas County Board of Commissioners · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Douglas County staff presented three FY27 CJCC operating grants totaling $389,335 with combined required matches; presenters said funds support clinical case managers, treatment and drug screening services for family treatment, chance and DUI accountability courts.

Douglas County staff presented three accountability-court grant opportunities to the Board during the July 6 work session and described how the awards would be used to support court-treatment programs.

The first presentation covered a CJCC FY27 operating grant (AW-ACFP-27-106) for $141,479 with a $24,967 match to support the Family Treatment Court program. Jamie Gafferbaum, who presented the item, said funds pay for a clinical case manager, treatment services and drug screening.

A second CJCC FY27 grant (AW-ACFP-27-147) for the Chance Court program was listed at $135,892 with a $23,981 match; Gafferbaum said it funds the same categories of services. The item the board discussed had been moved on the agenda to be heard consecutively with the related grants.

The third grant (AW-ACFP-27-125) covers the DUI court and was listed at $111,964 with a $19,758 match to be funded from the state court DUI court’s existing budget; staff presenting that item said the funds cover surveillance, treatment and drug screening.

Presenters described these awards as recurring CJCC funding the county receives to support accountability court programs. Staff recommended acceptance and said the grants would fund staffing and treatment services central to the programs’ operations; the work session record shows presentation and discussion but no recorded formal acceptance vote in this session.

The board asked clarifying questions about timing and budget match language; staff answered that these grants pay for treatment services and screenings and noted how matches would be funded through existing program budgets.