Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council holds first reading of electric-motorcycle ordinance to clarify enforcement
Summary
The council read Ordinance 2839 on June 22, proposing a new municipal code chapter to define and regulate electric motorcycles, restrict sidewalk and trail use, set equipment and operator standards, and authorize penalties; staff said the measure complements pending state rulemaking.
Get email alerts on the Electric Motorcycles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Enumclaw City Council on June 22 completed the first reading of Ordinance 2839, a proposed municipal-code chapter that would create distinct rules for electric motorcycles, staff said.
The city clerk read the ordinance title. The chief delivered the staff report, saying city staff have received complaints about high-powered electric dirt bikes and similar vehicles being operated on streets, sidewalks and multiuse trails. "Currently, Enumclaw Municipal Code does not specifically address electric motorcycles as a distinct vehicle category," the chief said, noting that the absence of clear municipal definitions leaves enforcement inconsistent and raises public-safety concerns.
Staff described key provisions the ordinance would add: a definition distinguishing electric motorcycles from e-bikes and mopeds based on power output and speed capability; prohibitions on sidewalk, park and multiuse-trail operation unless specifically authorized; requirements for helmets, lighting and minimum safety equipment for roadway use; operator requirements including a valid driver's license and age restrictions for roadway operation; and penalties ranging from warnings to citations, misdemeanor classifications for repeat or egregious cases, and vehicle impoundment.
Staff also cited pending state-level action: the report referenced a recent state legislative measure and a Department of Licensing work group with a target for state regulations in October 2027. City staff said the ordinance is intended to complement, not conflict with, state law.
Because this was the ordinance’s first reading, no final action was taken. Councilmembers may offer amendments and additional comment at second reading before a vote.
The staff report recommended the council adopt the new municipal code chapter to improve enforcement clarity and enhance public safety.
