Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rutherford council opens discussion on basement-bathroom limits and creating an "event space" zoning definition
Summary
Councilors heard public concerns about proposed limits on full basement bathrooms—intended to curb illegal basement apartments—and directed the borough to research alternatives. They also instructed the borough attorney to draft an ordinance to define and permit "event spaces" in business districts after a request from a local business owner.
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Two planning-related items drew extended discussion at the Sept. 8 Rutherford council meeting: a proposed zoning restriction on full basement bathrooms intended to deter illegal basement apartments, and a proposal to add an "event space" definition to the borough code.
Councilman Ero introduced the basement-bathroom topic after building and zoning staff reported receiving applications they suspect were intended to create impermissible basement dwelling units. "The building department and zoning departments have received applications for people constructing full basement bathrooms ... that they believe are essentially an effort to construct impermissible basement apartments," he said, framing the local enforcement concern.
Residents and professionals disputed the best remedy. Real-estate developer and resident Sarah Asher urged caution, saying a full basement bath is a common and modest homeowner upgrade and prohibiting it could impose significant costs (structural work or attic conversions) and unfairly burden homeowners who are not seeking to rent their basements. Katherine Marshall and others asked the council to consider clearer guidance and exceptions; David Laberno asked about audit and compliance protocols for existing pilot projects. Several councilors recommended collecting data on violations, exploring alternatives (stronger enforcement, targeted inspections, penalties, or permitting conditions) and returning with refined language rather than adopting a blanket ban.
Separately, Michelle Escaro, owner of Mason Cellar, described plans to reconfigure commercial space into a second, larger event venue. Council members discussed whether to permit "event spaces" explicitly in business zones (B3 and possibly B2) rather than forcing applicants to pursue a costly variance. Council directed borough staff and the borough attorney to draft ordinance language creating a definition for event spaces and to consider appropriate business districts.
Council members emphasized balancing homeowner rights and safety with enforcement needs. The matter of basement bathroom regulation will return to the council for further drafting and discussion; the borough attorney was asked to prepare a draft zoning amendment to define and permit event spaces in business districts.

