Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident questions why board member linked to a past teachers' "no confidence" vote remains negotiations chair

Saddle River Board of Education · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment a resident asked why a board member who had been the subject of a 2024 teachers' vote of no confidence remains listed as chair of negotiations, and members of the public also raised concerns about use of committee time and whether committee notes reflected those discussions.

During the meetings public-comment period, a resident identified as Asmini (of 8 Eugene Drive) directly questioned board leadership and transparency, asking why a board member who had been the subject of a teachers' vote of no confidence in 2024 remains listed as chair of the negotiations committee.

"I was wondering given how vocal you were about the fact that there was a vote of no confidence why you would still put that person to be the chair of negotiations, have you had a change of heart? is that person owed an apology given how adamant you were..." Asmini asked.

The speakers remarks tied into broader concerns raised later in the meeting about committee notes and whether personal matters involving board members were discussed in committee meetings. One public commenter referenced the auditors report to note the districts healthy reserves (more than $3 million mentioned in the comment) and asked how the board planned to prepare for approved housing projects.

Another attendee, Ron Wagy of Tower River, suggested the borough should pursue revenue-sharing provisions in any pilot agreement for the 20-22 East Allenale senior housing project to help offset development impacts on the district.

A board member later responded to a commenter by reminding a former board member about ethical boundaries and cautioned against discussing certain internal conversations in public comment. The board did not take any formal action on the specific request to change the negotiations chair during the meeting.

What happens next: The comments were entered into the record. Any personnel or committee assignments are set by board vote or by the presidents appointment process and would be handled at a future meeting or through board procedures.