Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning & Zoning approves Suarez site plan for 102 South Shore Road with conditions
Summary
The Salisbury Planning & Zoning Commission approved application #2024-0261 for site development and a single-family residence at 102 South Shore Road in the Lake Protection Overlay District, subject to three conditions including adoption of an affidavit, filing a Mylar lot split, and posting a performance and erosion-control bond.
Get email alerts on the Site Plan Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Salisbury Planning and Zoning Commission on Sept. 3, 2024 approved application #2024-0261 from Suarez for site development and construction of a single-family residence at 102 South Shore Road in the Lake Protection Overlay District (Section 404). The approval was unanimous, 5-0-0.
The commission imposed three conditions on the approval. First, the applicant must file an affidavit adopting the affidavit previously prepared by Attorney Riiska. Second, a Mylar showing the lot split must be filed with the Town Clerk. Third, the applicant must post a performance and erosion-control bond in an amount suitable for the project. The motion to approve was made by Allen Cockerline and seconded by Bob Riva; the vote was recorded as 5-0-0.
Commission members discussed the application as a site-plan matter subject to the Lake Protection Overlay District requirements; the minutes do not record further changes to design or engineering conditions beyond the three required items. The record lists Map 60, Lot 07 and a date of receipt (DOR) of 09/03/2024 for the application.
No public comment is recorded in the minutes for this item. The approval is limited to the actions recorded in the meeting minutes; the minutes identify Attorney Riiska as the author of the affidavit the commission required the applicant to adopt but do not quote any attorney or applicant statements directly.
Next steps noted in the minutes: the applicant must complete the three conditions before the approval is fully final per typical permitting practice; the minutes do not specify a deadline or the bond amount, which remain "not specified" in the record.
The commission took the vote during its Sept. 3 meeting; the full minutes were submitted by Miles Todaro, Land Use Technical Specialist.
