Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair says survey found commercial use of town dumpsters, questions remain on definition
Summary
After returning from executive session, the meeting discussed a survey by two people from Logan Township that found trash consistent with commercial sources; officials noted a business license is typically treated as the marker of "commercial" waste but the record left some details, including a municipal-count discrepancy, unclear.
Get email alerts on the Waste Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The meeting resumed after executive session and picked up a previously missed agenda item about dumpsters, where the speaker identified only in the record as the chair summarized the results of a recent survey and raised questions about enforcement.
The chair said two people from Logan Township conducted the survey and reported that the waste they examined indicated commercial, not residential, sources. "They pick up trash on the side of the street for 11 different municipalities," the chair said, describing the surveyors' work. The chair added that, "based on the ordinance and the type of trash that was found during the study," the businesses listed in the report appeared to be producing commercial trash.
When asked what determines whether trash is commercial, the chair said a business license is a key indicator: "If you have a business license, it's considered to be commercial," the chair said, while noting some uncertainty about other criteria. The transcript also includes an earlier, incomplete reference to "19 municipalities," creating an unresolved discrepancy between the statements that the surveyors serve 11 municipalities and the earlier, fragmentary remark; the record does not clarify the difference.
The discussion in the available record focused on classification: whether the dumpsters in question were being used by businesses in violation of local rules or whether the material found should be categorized differently under the town ordinance. The transcript does not record a formal motion, vote, or any enforcement action; it ends with the meeting continuing the discussion.
Officials did not specify the ordinance by number or provide a written report in the portions of the record provided. Next steps were not stated on the record.

