Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Decisions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Planning Board approves several site plans and resolutions

Village of Mamaroneck Planning Board · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 15 meeting the Planning Board approved site‑plan or resolution votes on several items (1067 Oaks, 1027 Constable, 209 Highview, 1024 Rushmore). Other applications (Mount Pleasant, 308 Melbourne, 124 Palmer) were continued, held or scheduled for further action.

The Village of Mamaroneck Planning Board took votes on multiple applications during its April 15, 2025 meeting. Results and short notes below:

- 1067 Oaks (wetlands permit / site plan): Approved as amended after consultant confirmations and a brief public hearing. Vote recorded as unanimous among members present.

- 1027 Constable (lift for floodplain compliance): Approved. Consultants confirmed floodplain and plantings will improve on‑site conditions and the board adopted the resolution.

- 209 Highview (pool site plan and stormwater): Approved after successful percolation testing and consultant sign‑off.

- 1024 Rushmore (pickleball courts): Approved with conditions; court lighting and use were restricted between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. and the applicant must comply with village noise and lighting code requirements.

Items continued or scheduled for additional review:

- 338–352 Mount Pleasant: Project update presented; board deferred action pending a building inspector zoning‑determination review.

- 308 Melbourne: Public hearing closed after substantial public comment; board requested hard copies of revised plans and scheduled an expedited follow‑up consult review.

- 124 Palmer (Dog Stop): Applicant introduced a special permit request; board set a public hearing (target May 14) and requested sanitation documentation and employee parking plans prior to the hearing.

The board’s votes were routine planning approvals or continued procedural steps; follow‑up technical checks (building permits, consultant confirmations and hard copies of revised plans) are required before work proceeds.