Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alachua County adopts land‑use amendment and rezoning for Southeast Hawthorne Road; developer agrees to conservation commitments and limit Lakeshore Drive vehic

Alachua County Board of County Commissioners · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The county adopted a large‑scale comprehensive plan amendment (Z25000003) and approved the matching rezoning to permit up to 149 single‑family homes on an 82‑acre site, with about one‑third of the property set aside as conservation and written commitments from the developer on dark‑sky lighting, native landscaping guidance and limiting vehicle access on Lakeshore Drive.

Alachua County commissioners voted to adopt a large‑scale comprehensive plan amendment (Z25000003) and approve a corresponding rezoning map that together would allow up to 149 single‑family detached homes on an 82‑acre property along Southeast Hawthorne Road, while setting aside roughly 30% of the site as a conservation management area (CMA) intended to connect to adjacent conservation lands.

Mady Bangatar of Alachua County Growth Management summarized agency review comments and the staff recommendation for adoption, noting the applicant had transmitted the amendment to state review following an earlier transmittal hearing. "The proposed conservation land use is aligned with the strategic ecosystem," Bangatar said while outlining the 200‑foot area where lots and roads would be prohibited abutting two parcels to the east.

During public comment, residents urged caution. Dave Drobac said adding housing next to Paynes Prairie risked environmental harm; another speaker, Eby, asked the board to "say no" to rezonings that erode natural habitats. Several neighborhood representatives and conservation groups, however, said they had worked with the developer and appreciated commitments on lighting, stormwater, native landscaping, and habitat protection.

Mark Brown of the county's Environmental Protection Department explained field work on wetlands and noted gopher tortoises in the southeast portion of the parcel that would need relocation if development proceeds. "There are... gopher tortoises that are present, within the Southeast portion of the property," Brown said, and staff described constraints and required coordination with state agencies for any relocation and wetland protections.

Clay Swagger, representing the applicant, told the commission the project would preserve a northern conservation area, limit development to single‑family homes and cap units at 149. Swagger also listed nine neighborhood recommendations and said the applicant intends to adopt dark‑sky design principles for street and residential lighting, incorporate fertilizer and irrigation restrictions in HOA documents, and avoid creating a vehicular entrance on Lakeshore Drive. "We as a result of these discussions, the developer intends to comply with dark sky design principles," Swagger said.

Commissioners debated which neighborhood requests could be required at adoption versus reserved for the preliminary development plan (PDP) or engineering stages. Several commissioners said they wanted the board to adopt an explicit restriction barring vehicle ingress/egress on Lakeshore Drive while allowing controlled pedestrian, bicycle or emergency access. The board added that restriction to the adoption motion.

After additional public comment praising the compromises between developer and neighbors, the commission voted by voice to adopt the comprehensive plan amendment with the Lakeshore Drive access condition and approved the matching rezoning map (Z2504). No roll‑call vote tallies were announced on the record; the clerk recorded the motion carried by voice vote.

Why it matters: the action changes land use and zoning near sensitive wetlands and Paynes Prairie and includes conservation commitments and developer commitments on lighting, stormwater standards and landscaping. The commission and public emphasized that technical stormwater and engineering solutions must be developed and approved at the PDP and permitting stages, and several speakers urged a third‑party or durable management arrangement for the CMA to avoid future underfunding.

What’s next: the developer will proceed to a preliminary development plan and engineering review; county staff and reviewing agencies (including water management and state review) will evaluate stormwater, wetland and species‑relocation plans and the applicant must provide HOA/CMA management details in subsequent submittals.