Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design review board approves large student‑housing proposal near University of Miami with conditions
Summary
The City of South Miami Design Review Board voted unanimously to approve a special‑exception large‑scale student housing project at 640 SW 57th Avenue, permitting 263 units (about 750 beds) and pressing the developer for further refinements on massing, tree mitigation and traffic safety before final approvals.
Get email alerts on the Student Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Design Review Board of the City of South Miami on Jan. 6 unanimously approved a special‑exception application from Subtext Acquisitions LLC to build a large student housing development at 640 Southwest 57th Avenue, across from the University of Miami.
The board approved the application with conditions and comments after hearing a detailed presentation from the development team and city planning staff. Mario Garcia Serra, representing Subtext, told the board the project is “proposed pursuant to the student housing regulations,” which the city adopted late last year to guide transit‑oriented housing near the university. Developer Matt Swedenberg said Subtext builds projects “from the resident up,” describing the site as an ideal off‑campus location for students.
The project as presented includes 263 residential units serving roughly 750 beds, approximately 422 parking spaces, and an amenity and circulation scheme with roughly 23,000 square feet of private open space in amenity decks and a linear public open‑space element that staff counted toward the required 10% public open space. Architect Sherry Gutierrez described a three‑mass building with internal courtyards, rooftop amenities and an internal garage and loading area. Alejandro Perez, the landscape architect, said the private open space provided on the amenity deck “is close to doubling the minimum requirement” and that the project meets the 10% public open‑space obligation.
City planning staff, represented by Mark Albers of the Corradino Group, said the project fits the Transit Support Downtown District (TSDD) and the TSNA subzone and noted the application complies with adopted density and parking formulas for student housing. Albers summarized staff’s review of massing, open space, parking, bicycle storage and loading, and said the package reflects a number of changes made in response to staff comments.
Board members praised architectural refinement but pressed the team for several changes to be addressed in later design review and permitting stages. Common concerns included:
- Massing and façade articulation: multiple board members urged stronger visual breaks and color/material variety to avoid a monolithic appearance facing single‑family neighborhoods to the west. - Tree and landscape mitigation: board members asked for species and placement revisions and raised concerns about street‑edge tree species and planters that could impact sidewalks and curbs. - Loading, trash and service access: staff and the architect described internal loading bays and a compactor zone; board members asked the team to confirm truck turning radii, minimum clearances and operational assumptions. - Traffic and pedestrian safety: members asked the team to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation on student crossing solutions and on a potential northbound left‑turn lane into the site from 57th Avenue. The applicant said those discussions were underway.
During board discussion, member Angel Lopez moved to “approve with comments”; the motion carried in a recorded roll call with all members voting in favor. Board members and staff emphasized that remaining technical items — final parking/loading details, tree mitigation plans, FDOT approvals for any signal/turn‑lane changes and final architecture refinements — will be worked out during the city’s Development Review Committee (DRC) process and at permit review. The board’s approval is a design review and special‑exception recommendation; city commission approval and final permitting are still required.
The applicant team said it would incorporate the board’s comments. Mario Garcia Serra thanked the board and said the developer looks forward to moving the project forward. The project will next proceed through DRC and then to the City Commission for final land‑use action.
