Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electric Vehicles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Miami asks vendor for formal proposal after initial Jolt EV charger pitch
Summary
A vendor proposed Jolt-branded fast EV chargers with integrated digital signage at downtown sites; commissioners requested a written proposal detailing locations, economics, procurement approach and coordination with the Placervia placemaking project before any commitment.
Commissioners took an initial presentation from Jolt on Dec. 2 and instructed staff to request a formal written proposal with terms and economic details. Commissioner Rodriguez introduced representatives who said Jolt would pay for installation, electricity and maintenance, provide a profit share of charging revenue to the city and offer each charger user one free daily commute charge.
Will, a Jolt representative, told the commission the company had identified locations including the last east‑side space in front of the Avalon building and several spots along Southwest 73rd Street. “We would be paying the city for the ability to be here,” Will said, adding that Jolt’s units include advertising capability the company proposed to make available for city messaging in emergencies.
Commissioners praised the concept’s potential to increase downtown charging access but asked for more detail on procurement and infrastructure. Multiple commissioners requested: (1) a written proposal showing locations vetted with the city’s Placervia placemaking team; (2) the economics and profit‑share model; (3) clarification on procurement (franchise vs. vendor agreement vs. piggyback contracting); and (4) technical plans for electric service to potential sites.
The commission did not take an action to authorize installation; instead, staff were asked to get a formal proposal and confirm whether piggybacking off existing contracts is allowable, and to coordinate with Placerbia/Placervia design work so chargers align with streetscape improvements.
What to watch: staff expected to return with a written proposal and procurement recommendation before any authorization to site equipment on city property.
