Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Retired FBI agent alleges wrongful firing and harassment in Johns Creek police squad during public comment

Johns Creek City Council · December 9, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Dec. 9 council meeting, Sean Mullis alleged his daughter, a former Johns Creek officer, was terminated following internal harassment and that multiple officers — several he says are from protected classes — subsequently left the department; he urged council and city leaders to investigate.

During public comment at the Johns Creek City Council meeting, Sean Mullis, a retired FBI agent, alleged his daughter — who served three years as a Johns Creek police officer — was fired after a non‑policy personal text and that command staff then fabricated additional allegations to justify termination.

"My daughter was a police officer here for 3 years. Chief Mitchell just fired her," Mullis said. He said command staff labeled the squad "problem children" and directed a lieutenant to "systematically harass and intimidate" officers until they resigned or were fired. Mullis asserted that four of the last five officers to leave were from protected classes and said the turnover has cost the city an estimated $1.5 million in recruitment, training and equipment.

Mullis said his daughter filed a complaint that an ATR manager initially opened, but that the city attorney shut down the investigation and would not allow her to present updated evidence. He asked the mayor, city manager and council to "correct this injustice before it's too late." The transcript records the allegation but does not include a response from police command, the mayor or city manager at the meeting.

The council did not take formal action during the meeting on the allegation; Mullis asked for an investigation and council members and staff may pursue follow‑up outside the public session. The transcript documents the claim and Mullis’s request but does not corroborate the assertion or show an official review outcome.