Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Variance Garage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board denies variance for large detached garage at Juniper Drive over impervious coverage and size concerns
Summary
The board denied a variance request that would have increased allowable building coverage to 34% and allowed a 30x50 metal detached garage at 2109 Juniper Drive, citing size, impervious surface and aesthetic concerns; staff advised the applicant on alternative permit routes.
Get email alerts on the Variance Garage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning & Zoning Board denied VA2422, a variance request from Article 5 that sought a 34% maximum building coverage (instead of the required 30%), a second paved driveway three feet from an existing driveway, and a 10‑foot rear setback to permit construction of a 30-by-50 detached garage at 2109 Juniper Drive.
Applicant Catherine Rivera told the board she needs storage for medical equipment and personal items and cited disability‑related needs. Neighbors and board members objected to the proposed garage’s size and the increase in impervious surface; one board member also questioned the metal appearance, saying it might read as a warehouse rather than an accessory structure.
Staff explained how building coverage and setback standards apply and noted that if the applicant reduced the size or designed the structure to meet setbacks and coverage, the permit could be processed without a variance. The board motioned and voted to deny the variance; staff offered to meet with the applicant to explain options for a smaller structure or alternative driveway approaches.
The applicant was advised that she can pursue a permit that fits the zoning standards (for example, a 20-by-50 structure that may avoid the need for a variance) and to call city staff for a walk‑through on acceptable options.
