Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Moratorium Citywide topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Edgewater planning board backs citywide one‑year moratorium on rezonings and related land‑use applications
Summary
After a lengthy public comment period focused on flooding and stormwater concerns, the Planning & Zoning Board voted to recommend that City Council adopt a one‑year citywide moratorium on rezonings, PUD amendments, comprehensive‑plan amendments, and new site/preliminary/final plats.
The City of Edgewater Planning & Zoning Board voted to recommend that the City Council adopt a one‑year citywide moratorium that would bar new applications for rezonings, PUD amendments, comprehensive plan amendments, site plans, preliminary plats and final plats.
Development Services Director Ryan Solstice told the board the moratorium would pause new entitlement applications citywide for one year from the second reading of the ordinance but would allow applicants who filed complete applications before the ordinance’s effective date to finish the process. "The citywide moratorium would not allow any new applications for rezonings, zoning PUD amendments, comprehensive plan amendments, site plans, preliminary plats, or final plats," Ryan Solstice said, adding that staff and the city attorney believe the moratorium is legally defensible.
Multiple residents urged the board to recommend the moratorium. Patrick Fisher, who identified himself as a resident at 2100 Airport Road, said the pause is necessary to protect the city’s environment and infrastructure while the municipality completes a stormwater master plan: "Moratorium is crucial for enabling us to complete and review our stormwater master plan… Without this plan, we simply do not have insight required to make responsible development decisions." Gina Holt and other residents described repeated flooding in neighborhoods such as Florida Shores and Turnbull Hammock and urged stronger land‑development standards.
Board members asked detailed questions about the moratorium’s scope — whether commercial or industrial projects would be exempt, how the proposal would interact with the state "Live Local" program and what benchmarks would end the pause. A board member noted the one‑year window is constrained by statutory limits and referenced the Bert J. Harris Act as a source of potential legal exposure; the city attorney advised caution on stacking short moratoria.
Staff said the council authorized $20,000 to accelerate a stormwater study so key data can be available within the moratorium period; staff also described a schedule of public education meetings and workshops planned to produce code and comprehensive‑plan amendments. The board moved to send a favorable recommendation to City Council.
The moratorium will proceed to City Council for its first reading; staff indicated the item could be scheduled for a December first reading with a second reading in January, and that the basin boundaries and draft language could be refined before second reading.
Next steps: the board’s recommendation will be forwarded to City Council; staff will continue the stormwater study work and public outreach ahead of council consideration.
