Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission moves Ridgetop cluster revisions forward after engineering clarifications

Danbury Planning Commission · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

BRT Skansen LLC presented revisions for the Ridgetop cluster development, including two raised sidewalks and a 20-foot loop road at the fire marshal’s request; planning and engineering staff reported no deal‑breakers and commissioners directed staff to draft conditions.

The Danbury Planning Commission heard a presentation March 4 from BRT Skansen LLC and its engineers on revisions to a previously approved Ridgetop cluster development (special exception number 589). The applicant described plan edits made in response to planning and engineering comments and said remaining items could be handled as conditions.

Engineer Steve Sullivan told the commission that the updated plans add two raised sidewalks on both sides of the loop road and that the loop road is 20 feet wide at the fire marshal’s request. Sullivan said planning and engineering comments had been addressed in the latest set of revisions and that most remaining items were narrative notes or clarifications rather than plan changes.

A commissioner asked whether the loop road is one-way; Sullivan confirmed it functions as a one-way counterclockwise loop. Planning staff (Ally) reported that there were no ‘‘deal breakers’’ from departmental review and recommended moving the item to old business so conditions could be added.

With the public hearing closed by voice vote, commissioners discussed the project in old business and expressed general support for approving the revisions with conditions recommended by staff. The chair directed planning staff to prepare the resolution and the conditions for final action at a subsequent meeting.

No formal recorded roll-call vote to approve the project was taken at this meeting; staff was instructed to draft the required conditions and resolutions for future action.