Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission endorses city recommendation to deny Latitude N 38 rezoning and PRD overlay
Summary
After extended public comment and staff analysis, the commission voted to accept the Department of Planning’s recommendation to deny the proposed rezoning and planned residential development overlay for the Latitude N 38 project, citing town center compliance, Main Street dedication and stormwater concerns.
The Wildwood Planning and Zoning Commission on March 2 voted to accept the Department of Planning’s recommendation to deny the rezoning and planned residential development (PRD) overlay for the Latitude N 38 proposal (Luxury Villas at Latitude N 38).
Staff traced the project’s long review history, noting the site has grown from roughly three to nearly seven acres and that unit counts and housing types have shifted over multiple hearings. The department said the current proposal—up to 44 attached single-family dwellings—represents a substantial deviation from the town center plan’s goals, and it listed seven specific reasons supporting denial, including concerns about streetscape, dedication and construction of the future Main Street, and unresolved stormwater impacts.
“As the department sees it, this particular proposal is the furthest any of them have been from what we hope to achieve in new urbanism,” department staff told the commission, and staff urged caution given ongoing plan changes and the limited information provided late in the day by the applicant.
Developer representatives and consultants said they had submitted additional materials and argued the revised plan reduces density compared with earlier proposals. Attorney Mike Doster told the commission the development team had prepared a written response to the information report and asserted compliance with applicable regulations: “we believe as our packet states that we've complied with all applicable, regulations,” he said.
Residents and neighbors testified about erosion, flooding and pedestrian and traffic safety on Etherton Road. Engineer David Volz described site changes—unit reductions, increased buffers, added parking and shifted stormwater detention—with technical details intended to limit off-site impacts.
After discussion, a motion to accept the city’s recommendation (which recommended denial of the rezoning and overlay) carried on a roll-call vote, with the majority voting yes and Chair Beatty recorded as a no. The commission’s action endorses the department’s concerns and returns the matter to the applicant for further refinement; the department indicated the item will return for later consideration if revised plans are submitted.
