Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Fns Hr1 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County officials warn HR 1 will raise workload and local costs for Medicaid and food programs
Summary
Economic services staff told the Rutherford County Department of Social Services board that federal HR 1 changes will shorten retroactive Medicaid coverage, shorten certification periods and cut administrative reimbursement for food and nutrition services, potentially adding thousands of case reviews and raising local costs.
Economic services staff told the Rutherford County Department of Social Services board that federal changes under HR 1 will increase the county’s workload and likely its share of administrative costs for food and nutrition services.
"So now, according to January 6, I think, to date, we have, over 5,400 people that's on Medicaid expansion," said Kelsey Love, who briefed the board on pending program changes. Love said that shortening certification periods and reducing retroactive coverage will create a substantial increase in annual reviews the county must perform.
Staff outlined three specific changes they said would take effect under HR 1: shortening retroactive Medicaid eligibility from multiple months to one month in some cases, reducing certification periods (from 12 months to six months for many expansion cases), and reducing the state reimbursement for administrative costs for food and nutrition services from 50% to 25%. "So that'll make our new share that we have to pay $1,606,701," Love said when summarizing staff projections; the board also heard staff describe an increase of about $535,000 compared with current local obligations (figures as presented to the board).
Miss Price, the budget presenter, told the board that the state’s current reported Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) payment‑error rate is above the federal 6% threshold. "Right now, the state error rate is at 7.1," Price said; board members and staff discussed the possibility that counties could be required to absorb some costs if the state remains over the federal limit.
Director Hunt said the county itself is currently below the federal error‑rate threshold. "As a county, we are below that 6%," Hunt told the board, adding that directors’ associations are coordinating advocacy around these changes and exploring ways to reduce errors and administrative burden.
The board discussed next steps including refining the county’s budget request to accommodate additional casework and monitoring how the state implements the federal changes. Staff said they are preparing specific budget requests tied to the estimated added workload and that more detailed figures will be presented in future reports.
The board did not take any formal vote or adopt policy on HR 1 during the meeting; discussion concluded with staff being asked to return with more detailed fiscal options and timelines for affected programs.
