Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Housing Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission advances first reading of student‑housing zoning rules amid debate on parking, room size and density
Summary
The commission approved first reading of an ordinance creating an 'off‑campus student apartments' land use in the TSDD, directing staff to tighten location/density limits and revisit minimum room size and parking ratios before second reading.
Planning staff presented a proposed ordinance to define and regulate off‑campus student apartments in the Transit‑Supported Development District (TSDD). Mark (planning staff) said the ordinance treats student housing as a residential use rented by the room, with unified management, one‑year leases by room, and a proposed minimum bedroom size (initially 100 square feet) and parking/bicycle requirements.
"We wanted to establish student housing as something that's different from regular residential," the planner said, describing goals to concentrate student housing around the MetroRail station and to reduce pressure on single‑family neighborhoods. Staff also proposed linking bedroom‑based counts to density (a working cap referenced in the draft was 400 bedrooms per acre) and recommended, as a starting point, parking roughly equivalent to multifamily requirements in the TODA core.
Commissioners objected to several technical items in the first draft: several said a 100‑sq‑ft minimum bedroom is too small and asked staff to examine 150–200 sq ft comparables; others urged a clearer differentiation in bedroom caps between TODA and TSNA subdistricts and requested more realistic parking ratios (Miami‑Dade County examples and a local development called Vox were cited). City attorney clarified that the draft included a one‑bathroom‑per‑student rule in the definition.
Developers and attorneys who commented during the public hearing generally supported the ordinance as market‑responsive but urged staff to refine the technical standards before second reading to ensure financing feasibility and to avoid unintended consequences. The commission voted 4‑0 to approve first reading and directed staff to return with refined boundaries for permitted locations, comparables on unit/bedroom sizes, and additional parking analysis prior to second reading.
Key outstanding items for staff between first and second reading include: (1) tighter geographic limits within the TSDD/TODA/TSNA to avoid overconcentration, (2) reconsideration of minimum bedroom size using market comparables (Vox and others), (3) analysis and recommendation on parking ratios (suggestions ranged from 0.5 to ~0.67 spaces per bedroom), and (4) refinement of bedroom‑per‑acre limits to account for TSNA versus TODA contexts.
