Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shoreland Application topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shoreland application for 6 Apenaki Road found complete; site visit set for July 8
Summary
At a local meeting, officials determined a shoreland-zone application for 6 Apenaki Road (Map 028, Lot 006) is complete and scheduled an on-site inspection for July 8 at 5:30 p.m.; the transcript records motions but does not include a recorded vote tally.
Get email alerts on the Shoreland Application topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a meeting, the body determined a shoreland‑zone application for 6 Apenaki Road (Map 028, Lot 006) is complete and set a site visit for July 8 at 5:30 p.m.
The Chair introduced the new-business item as a shoreland‑zone application for "6 Apenaki Road, Map 028, Lot 006," and asked the meeting to accept the application as complete. A committee member moved to accept the minutes from May 27, 2026, earlier in the meeting; later that same committee member moved to accept the shoreland application as complete. The committee member said, "I'll make a motion to accept the 05/27/2026," and later moved on the application. The Chair asked for a second and then, after motions, asked, "All in favor?" The transcript does not record the verbal vote or a roll call.
The Chair announced, "We'll schedule a site visit for July 8 at 05:30PM," to inspect the property in the field. The Chair also set the next meeting for July 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. and requested a motion to adjourn; a committee member moved to adjourn and the Chair seconded. The transcript ends without a recorded vote tally for the adjournment.
The transcript uses two spellings for the street name within these segments — "Apenaki" and "Abenaki" — which are shown here as presented in the record; the file does not include an authoritative street-name spelling. The record identifies the property by map and lot (Map 028, Lot 006).
No statutory references, permit conditions, application materials or staff reports were included in the provided transcript. The meeting did not record written vote tallies or the names of additional participants beyond the two speakers whose roles are evident in the record.

