Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves ice vending machine at 1317 South Richmond with size limit after resident noise objections

Planning and Zoning Board · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Edgewater Planning and Zoning Board on Dec. 10 approved a conditional use permit to place an ice vending machine at 1317 South Richmond Ave, limiting the unit to a 4x5-foot footprint at the northeast corner of the building after nearby residents raised noise and health concerns.

The Planning and Zoning Board on Dec. 10 approved a conditional use permit (CU 25-02) allowing an ice vending machine at 1317 South Richmond Avenue, restricted to a 4-foot by 5-foot footprint at the northeast corner of the building as shown on the survey.

City staff told the board that the property’s Highway Commercial (B-3) zoning treats ice vending machines as a conditional use and that public notice was provided within 500 feet. Applicant Doug Pay said the unit is the same model used at nearby businesses and described its footprint and intended placement next to an existing wall at the car wash, saying the machine “takes up about 20 square feet.”

Nearby resident Alexandria Martin told the board she and family members have lost sleep and suffered health effects from constant noise at the site, which she said has been measured “over 80 decibels” by enforcement. “I can’t sleep through the night,” Martin said, describing the property’s 24-hour operation and its effect on household members’ health. Brent Martin, who said his mother owns the nearby house, urged the board to consider the neighborhood’s quiet character and called additional ice availability “not necessary.”

Board members debated whether the vending machine should be treated as typical outdoor storage (which can be broad) and whether the permit should be narrowly written. One member proposed specifying the machine type and exact footprint on the survey to avoid broad future interpretation. The board amended a motion to permit a machine no larger than a 4x5-foot footprint in the northeast corner shown on the applicant’s survey and approved the permit.

The motion carried in roll-call voting recorded by the board as: Mr. Dwayne — yes; Mr. Fisher — yes; Mr. McGinnis — no; Mr. Kennedy — yes; Mr. Andrkovich — yes; Mr. Hatcher — yes (tally 5–1). The permit’s conditions require the machine be limited to the approved footprint and location; the record does not indicate additional operating-hour restrictions.

Because public comments focused heavily on noise from the broader site and not from the vending machine itself, the board and staff separated the narrow land-use approval (location and size of the vending machine) from operational or code-enforcement issues about existing noise. City staff said any code-enforcement findings would be handled separately by the appropriate enforcement office.