Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Fence Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Homeowner Jeff Day wins approval for corner‑lot fence variances in Green

Board of Zoning Appeals, City of Green · November 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City of Green Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously approved two fence variances for homeowner Jeff Day at 4308 Evergreen Court, allowing a 6‑foot fence on the Birch Court frontage and a 4‑foot wrought‑iron return on Evergreen Court to support a planned courtyard improvement.

Jeff Day, a new resident at 4308 Evergreen Court, received unanimous approval from the City of Green Board of Zoning Appeals on Nov. 20 for two fence variances to accommodate a spring courtyard project.

The board approved a 3‑foot height variance to permit a 6‑foot fence along the Birch Court frontage and a 1‑foot height variance to permit a 4‑foot wrought‑iron return along Evergreen Court, confirming those installations will not meet the standard front‑yard maximums under Green codified ordinance chapter 157. Chair opened the item by reading the variance requests and asking the applicant to explain the proposal.

Day, who said he moved into the house three weeks earlier, told the board the lot is a corner property with two frontages and that the landscaping for the courtyard is already in place. He said he deliberately left “a gap in the fencing” near two Norfolk pines so the fence would not create a continuous, intrusive wall, and that “the only gate will be on the wrought‑iron fence that faces Evergreen Court.”

Board members discussed the design and materials. One member noted the gap and its role in softening the street frontage, while another called the layout a good fit for surrounding homes. No members of the public objected during the meeting.

Mister Spate moved to grant both variance requests; Mister Schultz seconded. The clerk called the roll and the Chair announced the motion passed unanimously.

The board welcomed Day to the city and closed the item. No conditions beyond the variance approvals were recorded on the motion.

Next steps: with board approval secured, Day may proceed with permitting and installation according to city code and any standard building permit processes.