Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review Servicepro topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design Review Board forwards ServicePRO oil-change site to Planning and Zoning with conditions
Summary
The Green City Design Review Board on Oct. 1 recommended that Planning and Zoning approve a proposed ServicePRO oil-change facility on a 0.42-acre corner lot at Corporal Woods Circle and Corporal Woods Parkway, subject to a bypass lane and exterior-material adjustments.
The Green City Design Review Board on Oct. 1 unanimously recommended that Planning and Zoning approve a proposed ServicePRO oil-change facility on a 0.42-acre lot at the corner of Corporal Woods Circle and Corporal Woods Parkway, with conditions on site circulation and exterior finishes.
Applicant representative Mike Mokvi, of Cam Incorporated, told the board the company is seeking approval to sell the 0.42-acre parcel to a Michigan developer that would construct and operate the ServicePRO facility. "We are requesting approval for the half acre lot, 0.42 acre lot at the corner of Corporal Woods Circle and Corporal Woods Parkway," Mokvi said, explaining the team worked with city staff on design specifications and traffic management.
Jade Allarda, a city staff member who introduced the item, briefed the board that staff had reviewed the proposal and that applicants had adjusted landscaping and circulation to address board concerns.
Board members and the applicant focused on three conditions the board said should accompany a favorable recommendation: ensure a bypass lane to preserve vehicle circulation through the site, shift the gas meter to the back corner of the east side, and revise exterior finishes. The board suggested earth-tone materials rather than the originally proposed black brick, a colonial red roof rather than bright red, matching the fascia and gutters to the roof color, and considering dark bronze doors instead of clear anodized aluminum.
A committee member who seconded the motion said the design was acceptable "as long as that bypass lane is in there," signaling the board's primary operational concern.
The board voted to forward a favorable recommendation to Planning and Zoning. During roll call the clerk recorded yes votes from Mr. Glassner, Mr. Pickett and Mr. Deibel. Chair motioned that the recommendation include the landscaping and material suggestions and the clerk recorded the second and the unanimous affirmative responses of members present.
The recommendation will now go to Planning and Zoning for final review; the transcript did not specify a hearing date or final decision timeline.
