Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
South Miami planning board approves ordinance easing timelines and clarifying repairs for nonconforming structures
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Board unanimously approved PV-24-022, an ordinance from the City of South Miami that adds a definition for 'legal nonconforming,' removes a 12-month completion clause, extends the time to begin work from 60 to 180 days, and clarifies allowable maintenance and repairs.
The City of South Miami Planning and Zoning Board unanimously approved PV-24-022 on Jan. 14, a City Commission ordinance that revises rules for nonconforming uses and structures in Section 20-4.8 of the Land Development Code.
Staff told the board the draft ordinance adds a definition of “legal nonconforming,” removes a clause that previously required certain work to be completed within 12 months, extends the deadline to begin work after permit issuance from 60 calendar days to 180 days, and adopts maintenance and repair language similar to that used by Coral Gables allowing restoration or strengthening “provided any alteration conforms with the requirements of this section.” Staff recommended approval of the revised text.
Board member Jay Miller asked whether extending the start-of-work timeline risks creating long-term, inactive projects that could become derelict. Staff and the Chair said the Florida Building Code and the building-permit process provide enforcement tools — including required inspections about every six months and procedures that can result in permit closure — and stressed those mechanisms, not the zoning text alone, govern permit activity. The board noted those mechanisms do not resolve scenarios in which projects run out of funds after work has started.
After discussion, board member JR Corbison moved to approve the ordinance “as written.” The motion was seconded and the board recorded unanimous support; the board later confirmed the minutes reading that the ordinance “passes unanimously.”
Before the vote, a city administration representative asked the board to remove a separate fences item (PB-24-023) from the agenda so staff could return to the City Commission for clearer guidance; the board agreed to the withdrawal. During final review Christina Ortega identified an apparent incomplete sentence in the staff memo; staff confirmed the error was limited to the memo and that the ordinance text itself had been corrected.
The board also approved the Dec. 3 meeting minutes and set the next meeting for Tuesday, Feb. 11. The meeting adjourned without further business.
