Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Technical Review Committee tables India Palm triplex plan over stormwater concerns
Summary
The Technical Review Committee tabled a minor site‑plan approval for a proposed triplex at 2904 India Palm Drive after a resident questioned whether the project meets recent 100‑year stormwater retention expectations; the applicant agreed to resubmit plans showing discharge routed to the street.
The Technical Review Committee on July 1 tabled a minor site‑plan approval for a proposed triplex at 2904 India Palm Drive after committee members and a resident raised questions about stormwater retention standards and the planned discharge path.
Ken Hooper, a resident who identified himself as living at 1818 South Riverside Drive, told the committee that an ordinance passed in April requires new projects to meet 100‑year storm retention and that he did not see calculations in the submittal showing compliance. "Back in April of last year, the council passed an ordinance that said in essence, everything new has to match the hundred year storm for retention," Hooper said.
Chris Casey, the project engineer, said the application "had met the requirements for stormwater retention at the time of application" and that the plans had been reviewed by engineering, planning and zoning. He described a proposed swale that wraps three sides of the units and confirmed the design includes a culvert.
City staff explained the land development code distinguishes projects by impervious area. Staff said projects with more than 9,000 square feet of impervious surface require permit review and 100‑year storm modeling; for smaller projects the city has historically required on‑site retention sized to a 25‑year storm (approximately 1.5 inches of rainfall). Staff acknowledged the code is ambiguous about how exemptions apply to projects under the 9,000‑square‑foot threshold and that recent code changes are more restrictive.
Committee members pressed staff and the applicant on where overflow would be routed. Members said water should not be allowed to discharge directly into the canal and suggested routing overflows to the nearest paved street so existing retention areas could receive the flow. Casey agreed to revise the plans to show the discharge directed to the street and to resubmit the site plan.
A committee member moved to table the application "for additional detail related to stormwater." The committee recorded affirmative votes for Mister Thurman, Mister Varesi, Mister Maroney and Mister Milligan; the motion passed and the site plan was tabled. The committee directed staff to return the resubmitted plans to the Technical Review Committee and schedule another public vote.
The parcel is described in the application as a 17,523‑square‑foot lot in a medium‑density residential zone; the site plan is for a triplex. City staff said public notice was mailed to properties within 500 feet of the subject parcel. The committee did not make a final decision on the site plan and expects to act after the applicant files the revised drainage details and resubmits the plan for review.
