Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Action Plan Timeline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Alameda County reparations commission debates pop-up cutoff and fast timeline for action plan; Informing Change outlines March–June milestones
Summary
The commission debated whether to set a March 15 cutoff for pop-up listening sessions, discussed staffing and vendor logistics for outreach events and heard Informing Change’s schedule that calls for commissioners’ final recommendations in February and a target presentation to the Board of Supervisors in June.
After public comment on the Russell City tree, commissioners turned to outreach planning and the action-plan timeline. Commissioners reviewed several planned pop-up and listening-session events and disagreed on a scheduling cutoff: some members proposed a March 15 cutoff for scheduling new pop-ups while others asked for the full month of March to accommodate juvenile-justice clearances and other late-scheduled sessions.
Commissioner Sasse and others described specific upcoming events — a Black History Month celebration on Feb. 14 (Tri City African American Cultural and Historical Society), a volunteer/orientation day for the Black Joy parade and a Newark listening session — and asked for library and ECC promotional support and staffing. Commissioners and staff discussed vendor logistics, including a two-week lead time for food orders, Safeway orders for listening sessions and an administrative vendor onboarding process that requires invoices and has a $3,000 annual cap per vendor.
Michael Arnold of Informing Change presented an outline and a compressed schedule for drafting and approving the commission’s action-plan report. Arnold said the project team aims to receive the commission’s draft recommendations by Feb. 18 and final recommendations by Feb. 27 so Informing Change can produce a rough draft by March 18 and then move through two rounds of review before a final draft in late May, with a target board presentation or public rollout in June. Arnold emphasized two paths: recommendations developed by commissioners and supported by listening-session data, or recommendations developed by commissioners first and then tested against survey/listening-session results.
Commissioner Barry and others raised concerns about representativeness and noted current listening-session survey totals (roughly 120 from listening sessions plus additional outreach) and a target of about 400 survey responses for a meaningfully significant dataset. Commissioners urged transparency about what has been collected, who has been reached and how the Informing Change team will incorporate late-arriving input from events scheduled in March.
On logistics and budget, staff reported roughly $288,903 remaining in the commission’s overall budget, but noted some line items will require reallocation (facilitator fees and swag). Staff also summarized website work (collective action page complete) and asked commissioners whether to post short bios and headshots on the site; commissioners left that for a later decision.
The commission did not adopt a final scheduling cutoff at the meeting but asked staff to return options and to place a pop-up scheduling decision and the retreat agenda on the forthcoming retreat agenda for final action.
