Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislation Positions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PAL committee advances support for AB 617 and SB 434, registers opposition to newly numbered bill
Summary
The Alameda County Personnel Administration & Legislation Committee voted to advance support positions on AB 617 and SB 434 to the full Board and registered opposition to a newly numbered bill (transcribed as SB 811); the motion passed by voice vote and will move to the full board for final action.
The Personnel Administration & Legislation Committee of the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted to advance staff‑recommended positions on two state bills and to register opposition to a newly transcribed bill.
A supervisor moved to support AB 617 and SB 434 and to advance those positions to the full Board; the chair seconded the motion. The clerk called the roll and recorded affirmative responses and announced the motion passed. The committee did not receive any public comment on the proposed positions.
AB 617 (described in committee discussion) was presented as a bill pertaining to licensure and oversight of contracted organizations that provide in‑home personal care or respite services and exploring exemptions for nonmedical facilities to increase service availability. SB 434 was described as requiring a safe discharge plan when a resident of a residential care facility for the elderly receives a notice of eviction. Committee staff said the items reflect requests from a supervisor to take support positions on those bills.
Committee members also confirmed an opposed position on a newly numbered or renumbered bill (transcribed in the meeting as “SB 811”). Staff indicated the county previously took a position on a related bill (transcribed as SB 404) and that the new filing reflects a change in numbering; the transcript is not clear about the exact relationship or definitive bill number, and staff advised that the county will continue its opposed stance. (Bill numbering and the relationship between the previous filing and the new number were unclear in the meeting transcript.)
The committee’s action was administrative: the motion sends the recommended positions to the full Board for review and final adoption. The meeting record shows no amendments to the recommended positions and no public testimony opposing or supporting the committee motion.
The committee adjourned the PAL meeting to proceed to a joint session with the Health and Social Services Committee.
