Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Snap Funding Shutdown topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County committee hears that USDA will provide partial SNAP funds amid shutdown; state, county and food banks mobilize
Summary
Alameda County committee was briefed that USDA will provide roughly $4.6 billion in partial SNAP funding for November, leaving states to prorate benefits; California has deployed aid to food banks and the county has allocated $16.5 million plus private donations to respond. Guidance and implementation timelines remain unclear.
Get email alerts on the Snap Funding Shutdown topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Alameda County Personnel, Administration and Legislation Committee heard updates Monday on how the federal government shutdown is affecting food assistance programs and what California and the county are doing in response.
Emily Bauke Da Silva of CJ Lake told the committee that USDA plans to provide "4,600,000,000, which is partial benefits for the month of November," rather than full monthly SNAP payments that officials estimate cost about $9 billion. She said federal courts have ordered the agency to proceed but that states face technical and administrative hurdles to deliver prorated payments to recipients.
The nut graf: County officials and policy advisers warned that timing and method for delivering reduced benefits will vary by state and could take "a few weeks to up to several months," depending on legacy EBT systems and whether federal guidance from USDA and the Office of Management and Budget is forthcoming. That uncertainty drives immediate county-level coordination with food banks and state outreach.
A county staff member described the legal and budgetary mechanics behind the partial payment, saying Congress created a contingency fund after the 2013 shutdown that is now insufficient to cover full SNAP costs. "Congress set this $8,000,000,000 appropriation, contingency fund," the staff member said, and the available balance prompted USDA to allocate roughly half of the normal monthly payments. The staff member added that states will need to recalculate benefits at the household level, an administratively onerous task for older systems.
On the state response, Amy Costa of Full Moon Strategies told the committee California has joined litigation seeking to compel USDA to issue benefits and that the governor has deployed the state's National Guard "to assist food banks in the distribution of food and other items." Costa also said the state has directed an $80 million budget line item to food bank assistance and that California's Department of Social Services (Director Jen Troyer) would likely issue an all‑county letter once federal guidance arrives to explain how counties should proceed.
A supervisor told the committee that the Alameda County Board of Supervisors has set aside $16.5 million for food security and that $1.5 million in private funds recently were raised to support local food banks and community organizations during the disruption.
Jessica Montes of the Alameda County Community Food Bank identified herself to the committee and thanked officials for the information. Meeting staff also read names of other online participants who identified themselves as Elvia Quiroga (Alameda County Treasurer-Tax Collector's Office), Jessica Blakemore (Alameda County Health) and Hannah Hamilton (Alameda County Social Services Agency).
Committee members pressed presenters on whether SNAP recipients will be "made whole" once the federal government reopens. Presenters said beneficiaries are expected to be restored when possible but that the mechanics — and whether households will receive retroactive payments — remain unresolved until federal agencies issue clearer instructions.
The committee received the briefings and did not act on any motions. The meeting adjourned without votes.
