Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facade Grant topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

CRA board approves $20,293 reimbursement to Salty Dog Car Wash for new sign

CRA board · August 5, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The CRA board approved a $20,293 reimbursement to Salty Dog Car Wash for a new monument sign under the medium-scale facade grant program after staff reported the total project cost was $40,586 and that permits and fees were cleared.

The CRA board approved a $20,293 reimbursement to Salty Dog Car Wash for a new monument sign during its Jan. 8 meeting.

A staff member told the board the property owner, identified in the file as Ethan, applied under the board’s medium-scale facade improvement program, which offers a 50/50 match up to $25,000. “The total cost of work completed was $40,586,” the staff member said, and “so he is asking for $20,293 and no cents.” Staff also reported checking county and city records and finding no outstanding permits or debts tied to the property at 606 North Ridgewood Avenue.

Following the report, Mister Powers moved to approve the reimbursement. “Motion to approve the CRA facade grant reimbursement request in the amount of $20,293 to Salty Dog Car Wash,” he said. A second was recorded and the clerk conducted a roll call vote. Chairman DePew, Miss Gillis, Miss Bennington, Miss Dolbo and Mister Powers each voted yes, and the motion carried.

The grant request was processed as part of the medium-scale facade program the board previously approved on Jan. 10, staff said; the program provides matching funds to property owners for eligible exterior improvements. The board did not record any public comments on the item during the meeting.

After the vote the board moved on to the department director’s report, where staff said there was no additional report. The clerk closed the meeting and adjourned.

Upcoming procedural steps or payment scheduling for this reimbursement were not specified in the record.