Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Environmental Impact Commission tables multiple development applications, requests site staking and wetlands review
Summary
The Environmental Impact Commission on Aug. 27 tabled several regulated-activity applications — including proposals for 7 A Brighton Street and 4-6 Bear Mountain Road — and asked applicants to provide field staking, wetlands demarcation and a soil‑scientist report before returning.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Environmental Impact Commission on Wednesday tabled a series of land‑development applications and asked applicants to return with revised plans, field staking and additional environmental review.
At the start of substantive business, Ralph Gallagher, representing the applicant for 7 A Brighton Street (regulated activity 125178), described a revised plan that moved the proposed dwelling forward as far as zoning approvals allowed. Gallagher said the parcel is about 1.16 acres but that “most of it is wetlands,” and that the project had secured a zoning variance to reduce the front setback to 13.8 feet: “We went to 13.8,” he said. He told the commission that the health department had approved the septic and well layout but that staff reviewer Larry requested field staking and a demarcation feature to mark the inland‑wetland edge.
Commission members pressed for additional protections between the demarcation and the wetlands. One member asked the applicant to show a fence line and to plant a “select row of some shrubs” so the protected area is obvious; another asked that the applicant submit a list identifying native plants for verification. Gallagher agreed to show the demarcation on the plan and to provide planting details when he returns.
During the meeting the commission also heard from Dynas Verbigas, a professional engineer with Artel Engineering Group, on behalf of applicants for 4‑6 Bear Mountain Road (regulated activity 12524). Verbigas said staff had asked for full engineering drawings (submitted to staff the same evening) and described a ditch that appears in aerial imagery beginning around 2018. He said the applicants propose to reroute the ditch slightly and stabilize it with vegetation rather than piping: “What we'll look to do is stabilize it with vegetation, and keep it running on grade rather than with pipes,” he said. Verbigas told commissioners the applicant has contacted soil scientist Jim McManus to determine whether the feature is a regulated wetland or a non‑jurisdictional ditch and will return with that report.
Several applications were moved and tabled for further work and resubmission. Commissioners voted to table the Bridal/Brighton Street application, the Bear Mountain Road proposal and Bayberry Lane items to the next scheduled meeting; one application for Sharple Ridge Drive was withdrawn. Tabling motions were made, seconded and approved by voice vote.
Votes at a glance - Accept minutes of the Aug. 13 meeting — motion passed by voice vote. - Table regulated activity 125178 (7 A Brighton Street) — tabled; applicant to provide staking, demarcation and planting details. - Table regulated activity 12524 (4‑6 Bear Mountain Road) — tabled; applicant to provide soil‑scientist report and revised plans. - Withdraw application 12434 (Sharple Ridge Drive) — withdrawn. - Table application 124515 (Great Pass Through Road) and table regular activities 1246 Lot 1 and 1247 Lot 2 (Bayberry Lane) — tabled.
What happens next Applicants were asked to return with the requested clarifications: field staking, a demarcation feature marking the inland‑wetland edge, a native‑plant list for mitigation/landscaping, and, where applicable, a report from a soil scientist confirming whether on‑site features meet the wetland definition. The commission scheduled those items for consideration at its next regular meeting.
