Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alameda County outlines $6.7 billion FY 2026–27 proposed budget, highlights unincorporated investments

Alameda County Unincorporated Services Committee · June 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County Administrator’s Office presented a $6.7 billion all‑funds FY 2026–27 proposed budget, including $4.3 billion in the general fund, roughly $1.2 billion in community‑based contracts, and targeted unincorporated investments such as $70 million for roads and $65 million for fire protection. The Board is scheduled to adopt the budget June 30.

The Alameda County Administrator’s Office presented a high‑level overview of the proposed fiscal year 2026–27 budget, describing a $6.7 billion all‑funds package that the office said is balanced and supports approximately 10,400 full‑time equivalent positions.

Melanie Attendedo, County Administrator’s Office, told the Unincorporated Services Committee that the proposed budget includes about $4.3 billion in the general fund, roughly $1.2 billion in contracts with community‑based organizations, and highlighted unincorporated area investments including an estimated $70 million for road improvements and about $65 million for fire protection and emergency response.

The presentation framed the county’s fiscal challenge around sustained reliance on state and federal revenue (Attendedo said roughly 65% of the general fund comes from state and federal sources) and a mix of one‑time and ongoing strategies used to close a maintenance‑of‑effort gap. Attendedo said the all‑funds budget increased year‑over‑year by about $570 million and that pension prepayments reduced liabilities and helped close part of an earlier gap.

Why it matters: County officials said their fiscal flexibility is constrained by state policy and revenue limits, and they emphasized that many safety‑net services are funded and mandated at the state or federal level. For unincorporated communities, the CAO highlighted several targeted investments and said staff will continue to refine ZIP‑level reporting to make geographic impacts clearer.

Public comment and staff follow‑up: Community representatives and residents thanked staff for increasing transparency but urged earlier and deeper engagement, asking for more ZIP‑level and program‑specific context so residents can see how budget choices affect particular unincorporated neighborhoods. Attendedo and Supervisor Miley said staff can compile additional historical investment and ZIP‑level information and return for follow‑up presentations to Municipal Advisory Councils (MACs) or the Unincorporated Services Committee.

Next steps: Supervisor Miley said the full Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote on adoption of the FY 2026–27 budget on June 30. Committee members treated the presentation as informational; no committee action was taken. The CAO cautioned that state trailer bills and federal policy changes could require mid‑year adjustments.

Details and caveats: Figures cited by staff during the presentation included an all‑funds total of $6.7 billion, a general fund of $4.3 billion, approximately $1.2 billion in CBO contracts, and program investments (for example, roughly $288 million in the Home Together Fund for housing and homelessness). Attendedo also referenced an updated capital plan that showed multiyear capital needs and a financing gap staff said would be updated in future documents.

Supervisor and committee comments closed the discussion with a commitment to continued outreach and transparency; the committee will receive additional detail and possible follow‑up briefings per the CAO’s offer to return with geographic breakdowns if requested.