Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homelessness topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

San Diego outlines expanded temporary-shelter options and gaps in housing capacity

San Diego City Council · July 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff reported additions to the shelter system and new "safe sleeping" and noncongregate options but warned many temporary beds must be demobilized and that long-term shelter and housing gaps remain; council and the public pressed for more prevention, accountability and shelter-to-housing pathways.

City staff presented an informational update July 22 on the City of San Diego's comprehensive shelter strategy and related shelter inventory, reporting that the city's shelter capacity has risen to more than 2,500 beds through a mix of expanded shelters, noncongregate facilities and new safe-sleeping sites.

Sarah Jarman, director of the Homelessness Strategies and Solutions Department, said the 2024 point-in-time count found 6,783 people experiencing homelessness within city limits and summarized recent openings: a family motel conversion serving families, noncongregate domestic-violence shelter capacity and two large safe-sleeping sites administered by nonprofit partners. "These sites are offering an alternative to traditional shelter options," Jarman said, noting the program served more than 1,299 individuals at the safe-sleeping locations through May 2024.

Staff also warned of coming demobilizations: several temporary facilities operate under short-term permits and are slated for closure because of redevelopment or permit limits (including Golden Hall and other interim sites). HSSD estimates roughly 1,602 beds will need to be replaced or relocated over the next two years and said the city's system remains near capacity nightly.

Public commenters included people with lived experience, service providers and neighborhood representatives. Comments urged greater emphasis on prevention and direct financial assistance, more involvement of people with lived experience in planning, and caution about siting shelters in sensitive neighborhood locations. Some service providers endorsed the city's safe-sleeping and family-shelter innovations while also urging better staffing and recuperative-care options for medically vulnerable clients.

Staff outlined potential expansion options: additional safe-sleeping capacity at two sites, converting city- or school-district-owned parcels for safe parking and exploring private and public properties for shelter or safe parking. Funding identified in the FY25 budget includes a mix of federal and state grants, Community Development Block Grant carryover and City funds for project management and oversight.

What's next: Staff will continue site solicitation and convene a working group of stakeholders (service providers, lived-experience advisors, county and housing commission partners) to refine program designs and site plans; several bed-addition and demobilization milestones were described for the coming 12'24 months.

Why it matters: The update mapped immediate operational capacity, near-term closures and the city's attempt to preserve service continuity as temporary options expire. The council and public repeatedly emphasized a need for stronger links between shelter beds and pathways to permanent housing and for clearer reporting on the use of funds and program results.

Provenance: Presentation (HSSD), point-in-time count figures and shelter inventory (Sarah Jarman), public comment (multiple speakers).