Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Piedmont approves roof-deck variance at 160 Moraga in 3–2 vote after neighbor objections
Summary
After extended public comment about privacy, roofline and safety, the Planning Commission approved variances and design review for a roof deck and stairs at 160 Moraga Avenue, adopting six conditions; the vote split 3–2.
Get email alerts on the Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Homeowners and architects seeking a roof-deck retrofit at 160 Moraga Avenue presented a reduced, glass-railed design that they said lowered visual impact and improved fire-safety performance. The April 13 hearing drew multiple neighbors who said the proposed deck and its stairway would loom over adjacent yards, reduce privacy and occupy tight setbacks.
Neighbors described the site as unusually constrained and urged the commission to require relocation of stairs or a different deck footprint. "Now the deck looks into our entry, and it has always sort of loomed over the house," said Brian Pometta of 161 Renata Avenue, who urged moving the deck or redesigning the stair so it would be less visible from his property.
Applicant Frank Northaft and architect Anton Kornienko said they had reduced the deck size, changed the railing to glass and removed an overhang to cut visibility. Northaft said site constraints and existing lot layout limited alternative stair locations and that glass railings and smaller footprint minimized shading and obstruction.
Commissioners split on compatibility and neighbor impacts. Commissioner Ortiz and Commissioner Cooper argued the revisions reduced impacts and were feasible given the severely constrained lot; Commissioner Yee and Commissioner Buesseling expressed concerns about the stair configuration, compatibility with the midcentury-modern house, and privacy for the lower neighbor. After debate the commission approved the variances from side-yard and rear-yard setbacks and the design review under a CEQA Class 1 exemption, 3–2, with six conditions from the staff report and additional clarifications about materials and glass railings.
What happens next: The applicant must meet conditions outlined in the staff report and submit construction documents to building staff for review and permitting. The vote record was 3 in favor, 2 opposed.
