Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permits Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Moody Lane application, reviews Franklin Street wetlands violation and schedules fees work group
Summary
The Danbury City commission approved an application for Moody Lane, heard staff report on a wetlands violation at 124 Franklin Street and set a work group meeting to refine fee language; several other applications were granted procedural extensions or tabled.
The Danbury City Environmental Impact Commission approved the staff‑recommended conditions for regulated activity 123431 (Moody Lane) after the applicant, who participated by phone, said he had no objections to the staff report.
Staff member Larry reported that Rob Sherbet, the applicant, had reviewed the staff report and the client “does not at this point have any objections.” A commissioner moved to approve the Moody Lane application according to the staff report and stated conditions; the motion passed by voice vote.
Separately, staff told the commission about a recent enforcement action at 124 Franklin Street, where a May 5 inspection found grading and filling within a wetland, stockpiling of materials, storage of equipment and clearing without permits. Larry said he instructed the property owner to stop work and expects remediation; other pending violations were noted.
On older agenda items, the commission granted a 65‑day extension for the Grapevine Road application (regulated activity 1241128) at the applicant’s request and tabled multiple other applications (including items listed in the agenda as Mountainville Road and Terry Wylde Lake Road) to the next regular meeting.
Commissioners also scheduled a fees work group meeting (proposed Monday at 4:30 p.m.) to clarify fee descriptions and to discuss whether fee items should be placed in an ordinance or retained in regulation; staff and the town attorney expressed a preference to keep fees in regulation, and commissioners discussed placing them in an appendix to ease future updates.
Why it matters: The Moody Lane approval advances a specific permit with conditions; the Franklin Street enforcement item underscores the commission’s ongoing compliance and remediation work. The fees work group will shape how the commission charges for services and whether those charges require ordinance changes or regulatory updates.
What remains open: The transcript lists enforcement dates and regulated‑activity numbers as spoken in the meeting; in several places the numeric identifiers were inconsistent in the record. Where the transcript lacked full roll‑call vote details, votes are reported as passing by voice vote.
