Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resilience Water Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff outline Resilient Hampton water plans for Fox Hill, Grandview and Harris Creek; three-day design workshops scheduled
Summary
The city's Resilient Hampton team detailed watershed-level planning for Fox Hill, Grandview and Harris Creek, summarized community feedback (flooded roads, erosion, property damage), and announced three-day design workshops and public gallery walks to develop conceptual strategies and preliminary benefit-cost analysis.
Get email alerts on the Resilience Water Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff on Tuesday briefed the council on the Resilient Hampton initiative and an ongoing watershed-level water-planning effort covering Fox Hill, Grandview and Harris Creek, presenting projected flood scenarios, community input and next steps for design workshops.
Olivia Askew, the city's chief resilience officer, told council the program uses an asset-based resilience definition and three main implementation buckets: planning and policy, projects and programs, and people and partners. She said staff use regionally adopted sea-level-rise planning horizons — 1.5 feet by 2050, 3 feet by 2080 and 4.5 feet by 2100 — when designing projects.
Askew reviewed a menu of strategies the city may use, from green solutions such as bioswales, rain gardens and living shorelines to engineered approaches including seawalls, berms, drainage pumps and tide gates. She emphasized layering public benefits into projects so flood-reduction work also enhances access, habitat and the local water economy.
Staff presented maps showing present-day flood risk (10-year and what the presenter called a 50% annual-chance area) and projections that flood-prone zones will migrate inland under sea-level-rise scenarios, potentially enlarging areas that could flood annually. The presenters said community engagement to date included about 23 resident interviews and three open houses with around 160 attendees; residents raised five common themes: frequent road flooding, access concerns for emergency services, perceived lack of maintenance on stormwater infrastructure, shoreline erosion (noted on Grandview) and property damage from flood waters.
Funding cited for the planning and initial projects included a community flood preparedness grant from the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation awards and the National Coastal Resilience Fund. Staff announced a three-day design workshop with public evening gallery walks at the Fox Hill Neighborhood Center to develop conceptual strategies and assess policy hurdles; they said staff will return to the public and council later with a formal water plan staff will ask the council to adopt as a comprehensive plan amendment.
Council members pressed on implementation details. Councilwoman Campbell asked about dredging near Wallace’s Marina and whether dredge spoils could be reused; staff said the public works stormwater team manages dredging schedules and staff are exploring 'thin layer placement' of spoils to help wetlands adapt to rising seas. Vice Mayor Brown asked whether neighborhoods can apply for grants and whether staff provides help applying; staff described several programs — the Virginia Conservation Assistance Program (living shorelines), an upcoming parcel-level 'rain grant' program for property-level stormwater practices, and neighborhood improvement grants — and said staff would partner with applicants.
City staff and the manager also outlined longer-range federal funding avenues. The city has for years pursued an Army Corps coastal storm risk management study (a typical prerequisite to access major federal matching funds for structural projects); staff said rule changes and funding limits have complicated that process, and city representatives and congressional offices are working to secure study language or alternative study funding to allow structural options and federal cost-sharing in future phases.
Staff said the design workshops and community review will produce conceptual strategies, a preliminary benefit-cost analysis and an implementation blueprint that will be used to pursue funding and, eventually, construction where feasible.
