Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly expands land bank authority and retools J‑51 tax abatement; transparency measure for MCI audits passed
Summary
Floor debate clarified expansion of authorized land banks (from 31 toward 45), reauthorization and expansion of New York City's J‑51 tax abatement (raising qualifying thresholds and increasing abatement up to 100% in some cases), and passed a transparency bill requiring Housing and Community Renewal to publish results of annual MCI audit samples.
Lawmakers on May 20 questioned and approved provisions that expand the number of permanent land banks the state can authorize and reauthorize reforms to New York City's J‑51 property tax abatement program, while passing a transparency measure to publish results of HCR's audits of Major Capital Improvement (MCI) rent‑increase applications.
On land banks: Members sought clarity on how many communities currently have land banks and the process for municipalities to create new ones. The floor was told the state currently has 31 permanent land banks and the bill contemplates expanding the number toward 45 to meet demand; the sponsor said those additional slots are intended for municipalities that have not previously applied.
J‑51 reforms: The J‑51 changes in the enacted budget broaden eligibility in limited ways and change abatement thresholds; one member asked about the expansion to a 100% abatement from a previous cap at 70% and whether the city council must sign off. The sponsor said city council approval will continue to be part of implementation and that the enacted compromise reflects negotiations with the executive.
Transparency for Major Capital Improvements: The Assembly also passed a bill requiring the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to publish the results of its annual audit of 25% of approved MCI applications (for example, boiler or roof replacements) so the public can see audit outcomes; the sponsor described the measure as a simple transparency step and the floor passed the change.
Outcome: The measures on the housing calendar were advanced and passed on the floor; members said the changes will support local property rehabilitation while adding a public accountability layer for MCI approvals.
