Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Performing Arts Center topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Johns Creek council reviews $50M performing arts center estimate, asks staff for financing and operations options
Summary
City Manager Kimberly Grier presented a PBK construction and operating estimate for an 800‑seat performing arts center (base cost ~ $50 million; annual operations ~$617,000). Council expressed general support but directed staff to return with financing options, a staffing/operations model and recommended public engagement timing before any construction authorization.
City Manager Kimberly Grier presented results of a PBK study on April 14 that estimated a base construction cost of about $50,000,000 for an 800‑seat performing arts center and listed optional classroom additions. Grier said design fees are estimated at roughly $5,000,000 and the memo shows a $5,000,000 contingency; first‑floor classroom space was estimated at $5,300,000 and second‑floor classrooms at $5,700,000. She said the consultant’s operating estimate for the building is about $617,000 a year plus a 15 percent contingency, and that the operations estimate did not include staff costs because council asked the analysis to focus on facility operations.
The mayor framed the meeting as a check‑in and said the council should not authorize construction documents until it has firm financing information. “If we had a majority tonight that said that they didn't want to pursue any longer, then I think the city's involvement would probably die,” the mayor said, adding he wanted staff to return with information about cash on hand and financing options before taking a construction vote.
Several council members pressed for outreach and a business model from likely users. One council member urged mailed surveys and three town halls citywide so residents who would bear any tax change can weigh in and so staff can gather user commitments and realistic revenue assumptions. Concerns about competing capital needs were raised: council members noted a parks request package of roughly $62 million in coming years and that the 10‑year forecast shows a roughly $5.3 million surplus in fiscal 2026 but tighter balances thereafter.
Council discussion also covered possible funding paths. Members discussed accrual funds, public‑private partnerships and the possibility of a bond referendum; City Manager Grier said staff would consult the city's financial adviser and confirm referendum timing (the council was told bond referendums must be placed on specific elections and that a summer call decision is required to meet a November ballot). Several members said the operations and staffing model should be developed in tandem with financing to understand annual subsidy needs.
By the end of the discussion, council expressed broad support for developing more detailed finance, operations and outreach materials rather than moving forward with construction authorization. Staff was directed to return with: (1) detailed cash‑on‑hand and financing options, (2) a recommended staffing/operations model (insourced/outsourced/PPP), (3) refined scope options (whether to include classroom additions) and (4) a plan and timing recommendation for public engagement tied to financing scenarios. City Manager Grier said staff would bring pieces forward as they are ready and would confirm any referendum calendar with the financial adviser.
The work session moved on after council provided direction to staff; no construction authorization or vote took place.
