Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the E Bikes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brentwood panel weighs ordinance changes to curb unsafe electric-bicycle use by youth
Summary
The Public Safety Commission discussed proposed ordinance language that would treat some electric bicycles differently from pedal bikes and make it unlawful for a parent to allow a rider under 17 to operate an electric bicycle in violation of traffic laws and helmet rules. Staff was asked to get legal comparisons and return Jan. 28.
Get email alerts on the E Bikes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brentwood Public Safety Commission on Jan. 7 discussed proposed changes to city ordinances governing electric mini-bicycles, scooters and similar motorized devices after increased complaints about juveniles riding unsafely.
Residents urged careful drafting so responsible users — including riders with disabilities — are not unduly affected. Stuart Clark of St. Clair Avenue described his experience using e-bikes, trikes and tandem bikes for disabled riders and offered to help staff craft language that avoids unintended impacts; Mark Abels, also of St. Clair Avenue and an owner of an electric tandem bike, said different classes of bikes exist and encouraged greater parental involvement to improve safety. Sue Cronin of Salem Road voiced discomfort about a sex offender living nearby and asked what notification steps might be available; Major Sullivan said the police department is investigating a related complaint.
Staff explained current ordinance classifications treat gas-powered mini-bikes as motorcycles (which require a driver’s license) but classify electric-powered bicycles as traditional pedal bicycles, limiting enforcement options for juvenile riders. According to the minutes, the City Attorney reviewed and proposed language that would make it unlawful for a parent of a child under 17 to allow the child to operate an electric bicycle in violation of traffic laws, including helmet requirements.
Commissioners asked staff to obtain an executive summary from the City Attorney that compares Brentwood’s approach with other municipalities and to return with recommended statutory language. Members also expressed interest in a public-awareness communications campaign if changes are adopted and suggested consulting the local school district for input.
The commission did not vote on an ordinance at the Jan. 7 meeting; staff was directed to prepare follow-up materials for the Jan. 28 Public Safety Committee meeting.
