Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Payroll Adjustment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Finance committee outlines $113,100 package to fund 3.25% average pay increase for nonbargaining staff

Green City Council Committees · May 26, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance Chair Humphrey told the committee that resolution 2026 R‑23 would authorize $113,100 to permit an average 3.25% across‑the‑board pay increase for City of Green nonbargaining employees; committee discussion confirmed the increase was budgeted and that limited discretion exists to make a few individual adjustments after position assessments.

The Finance Committee on May 26 reviewed resolution 2026 R‑23, a third‑reading measure authorizing funds so the mayor can grant salary adjustments to City of Green nonbargaining employees. Committee Chair Mister Humphrey said the total amount tied to the ordinance is $113,100 and asked the administration for the expected percentage increase.

The administration stated the budgeted, across‑the‑board increase averages 3.25%. Chair Humphrey and committee members clarified that the increase is budgeted as a uniform adjustment but that limited discretion will allow small individual adjustments for position changes or redistributions; those individual assessments had not been completed and staff said they would share details with counsel once finished. A committee member asked whether past practice included additional individual raises beyond across‑the‑board increases; the administration said not this year beyond the budgeted 3.25%.

The committee indicated it would make a motion on 2026 R‑23 at the appropriate time during the regular council meeting; no committee vote on final adoption is recorded in the committee discussion.

Why it matters: the adjustment affects city payroll and was already anticipated in the city's budget process; committee members sought clarity on how discretion would be exercised and requested follow‑up information once position assessments are completed.