Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Partnerships topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs allyship and academic partnerships and refers Reparations Commission $4.66M budget for vetting
Summary
The ad hoc committee approved in concept partnerships with community organizations and academic institutions and referred the Reparations Commission's roughly $4.66 million two-year budget request to the County Administrator and the sponsoring department for line-item vetting; the committee also asked for a philanthropy prospects list by September.
The Alameda County Board’s ad hoc committee on reparations approved in principle a plan to partner the Reparations Commission with community 'allyship' organizations and academic institutions and referred the commission’s two-year budget request — about $4.66 million — to the County Administrator and the soon-to-be-selected sponsoring department for further review.
Deborah, the commission chair, presented two linked proposals: (1) an allyship plan to engage civil-rights organizations, economic-justice groups, faith-based partners, unions and local foundations to support outreach and listening sessions, and (2) partnerships with academic institutions to lead comprehensive research and produce a final report that would inform recommended reparative measures.
Board members sought clarity about the structure — whether agreements would be informal letters of intent or formal memorandums of understanding that require county counsel review. Commissioners said allyships will vary from informal convenings (e.g., faith-hosted town halls) to formal MOUs with research partners; academic partners were described as the likely structured research arm while community partners provide outreach and facilitation.
The commission presented a two-year budget totaling roughly $4,665,000 to cover subcommittee staffing, research consultants, listening sessions, outreach, data collection, legal support and information materials. Commissioners said the total could be offset partly by philanthropic or in-kind support from universities and foundations, but supervisors said the budget needs closer vetting.
The committee voted to refer the budget to the County Administrator’s Office and the sponsoring county department for a line-by-line analysis and to return with a recommended Year 1 (partial fiscal-year) budget by the end of the calendar year. The committee also asked the commission chair and vice chair to provide a list of potential philanthropic funders by September.
In public comment, community organizations urged robust countywide engagement (town halls, targeted district outreach and surveys) and suggested exploring local budget sources, including reallocations from law-enforcement–related lines, to fund reparations work. Board members said they welcome philanthropic support but must ensure fiduciary oversight and avoid sole-source procurement.
