Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tenant Protections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tenants, advocates press Alameda supervisors for rental registry, inspections and more legal/assistance funding
Summary
Staff briefed supervisors on tenant‑protection options for unincorporated Alameda County; the board heard broad public support for a rental registry, proactive rental inspections pilot, mediation and emergency rental assistance and urged staff to move quickly while balancing impacts on small landlords.
Alameda County heard a broad set of community requests on Tuesday as staff updated the Board of Supervisors on tenant‑protection work for the unincorporated county. Housing staff recommended several near‑term steps — including a targeted proactive rental‑inspection pilot in low‑income unincorporated communities, amendments to the county business license ordinance to enable a rental registry, an anti‑harassment ordinance and a rent‑review mechanism — and asked the board for policy direction and funding priorities.
Staff said work to date has included a multi‑stakeholder steering committee, a white paper summarizing city practices across Alameda County and several ARPA‑funded pilot programs that end this December. The county has already adopted a “just cause” eviction ordinance and a mandatory mediation program; the mobile‑home rental registry is in place, staff said. Michelle Starrett, the county housing director, said the proposed pilot would begin in Ashland, Cherryland and Hayward Acres — older, lower‑income neighborhoods where unit and habitability needs are greatest — and that the county would seek to make landlord registration and outreach scalable.
Public testimony was extensive. Nonprofit housing providers and tenant advocates urged quick action on a number of fronts: emergency rental assistance, scalable legal aid and tenant counseling, creation of a rent review board or rent‑review process, a rental registry and stronger anti‑harassment protections. Mobile‑home park residents and advocates asked for acquisition dollars and a legal defense fund to help parks convert to resident or nonprofit ownership and avoid corporate takeover and resident displacement.
What’s next: Staff asked for direction on priorities and indicated the county can implement some measures quickly by augmenting existing ARPA‑funded contracts or using expedited procurement; other changes will require ordinance changes and committee review. Supervisors agreed to prioritize measures that protect tenants while avoiding undue regulatory burdens on small “mom‑and‑pop” landlords and asked staff to return with implementation details and cost estimates.
