Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Horry County Council approves multiple zoning and land‑use measures, dissolves special‑purpose district

Horry County Council · May 19, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council advanced and approved a series of ordinances: second readings on future land‑use amendments and the dissolution of the Eagle Trace special‑purpose tax district; third reading approval of zoning changes to planned development districts; and multiple first readings on rezoning requests. One rezoning was withdrawn by the applicant and the motion failed on the record.

Horry County Council approved several ordinances affecting land use and special-purpose districts during its meeting, moving multiple items forward with little public comment.

Council moved ordinances 38 and 39 to second reading and public hearing to change the Imagine 2040 comprehensive plan future land-use designation for a listed PIN from residential to commercial agriculture. The council also approved Ordinance 48 to dissolve the Eagle Trace Special Purpose Tax District, a district originally enacted by Ordinance 142-2024.

On zoning, council passed Ordinance 117 (2025) on third reading, which amends Articles 2 and 3 of the county zoning ordinance related to planned development districts. Council debated Ordinance 23 (amending landscape buffer and tree preservation standards); a motion to defer the second reading failed, and the council approved Ordinance 23 as amended.

The council took first readings on several rezoning requests: Ordinance 51 to rezone PIN 46906040008 to convenience and auto-related services, Ordinance 52 to rezone a 1.99-acre portion of a PIN to Residential SF-20, and Ordinance 57 (to rezone PIN 25200000051) was withdrawn by the applicant. Following discussion of procedural options, the council recorded a motion result that concluded the withdrawn item would not be approved.

Most of these measures advanced without extended public hearings or prolonged debate and were recorded as passing by voice vote or unanimous consent in the meeting transcript. Council members and the chair addressed procedural points and confirmed the presence of packet amendments where applicable.