Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Cte Expansion topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Montgomery County joint committees press partners to scale CTE and dual enrollment to meet 2030 credential goal

Montgomery County Joint Committee (Education & Culture; Economic Development) · December 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council and education leaders reviewed MCPS, Montgomery College and WorkSource Montgomery plans to expand Career and Technical Education, reduce wait lists and meet the state Blueprint target for industry credentials by 2030; councilmembers asked for concrete benchmarks, cost estimates and transportation solutions.

A joint session of Montgomery County’s Education and Culture and Economic Development committees on Dec. 8 heard presentations from Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS), Montgomery College and WorkSource Montgomery on efforts to expand Career and Technical Education (CTE) and get students into apprenticeships and industry-recognized credentials.

Chair Jawanda opened the meeting saying the county must speed efforts so graduates can enter in-demand trades and industries. Genevieve Floyd, director of the MCPS Department of College and Career Readiness, summarized the state’s Blueprint goals and a pending redesign of CTE: Maryland is moving from 10 to 14 career clusters and reducing state‑approved programs from 86 to 48; the state approved standards in September and expects local implementation by fall 2027.

Floyd said the state’s aspirational target—about 45% of graduates earning an industry-recognized credential by 2030—translates to roughly 30,000 students statewide if the standard is met; MCPS currently reports far fewer students meeting the registered‑apprenticeship “gold standard” (40 apprenticeships among 275 graduating seniors in the latest reporting). She described MCPS definitions for enrollee and concentrator status and a three‑tier model for work‑based learning: Tier 1 brisk exposures (<75 hours), Tier 2 course‑based internships or dual‑enrollment (≥75 hours), and Tier 3 paid registered apprenticeships.

Noelle Delmona and Dr. Chantal Vilmore from Montgomery College outlined the college’s Godelsky Institute labs and articulation agreements that let high school students earn college credit; the college reported steady increases in dual‑enrollment participation in construction and transportation programs and described outreach events that connect students with employers.

Anthony Featherstone, executive director of WorkSource Montgomery, described MOCO CAP (the Montgomery County Career Advising Program), a dialogic advising model that surveys students about strengths and interests and links them to career themes and industry partners. Featherstone said WorkSource and the county’s industry partners are piloting a tiered engagement model that can move employers from light touch activities (career days) to hiring youth apprentices.

Councilmembers used the Q&A to probe capacity and practical barriers. Councilmember Meeks asked about differing counts in the staff packet: MCPS staff clarified that 1,042 refers to grades 9–12 students who earned some certification in the year and 275 refers to graduating seniors who earned credentials. Councilmembers pressed staff for internal benchmarks and a concrete plan—short, medium and long term—showing how many new employer partners, classroom sections or dual‑enrollment seats would be added each year toward the Blueprint goal.

On transportation and access, MCPS said it provides transportation to CTE programs and is partnering with agencies (including the MVA) to improve permit and driver‑license access for students where needed. Staff agreed to return with more granular data on cost per pathway, dual‑enrollment credits, where students go after graduation and attendance trends for CTE participants.

No formal motions or votes were taken. The chairs directed staff and partners to return in the spring with a more detailed ramp‑up plan that can inform the county’s budget process.