Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Newtown Road Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Decision on Newtown Road bank and fast-food site delayed as commission seeks traffic memo
Summary
The commission continued the public hearing for a proposed bank and fast-food restaurant at 55 Newtown Road after debate over one-way vs. two-way internal circulation and requests for a written response to the city traffic engineer; applicant says added signage and minor traffic calming reduce impacts.
Get email alerts on the Newtown Road Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Danbury Planning Commission continued its public hearing on Feb. 19 for a site plan and special-exception application at 55 Newtown Road after commissioners asked the applicant for a written response on traffic-circulation concerns raised by the city traffic engineer.
Attorney Tom Beecher, representing 55 Newtown Road, LLC, said the project includes a bank (with ATM and two drive-through teller lanes) and a fast-food restaurant with a drive-through and that several departmental comments have been incorporated into revised plans. Beecher said the bank is expected to generate roughly 466 daily trips by the trip-generation table and that the applicant’s traffic engineer concluded the project will have a "negligible overall impact" on the surrounding intersections.
At issue was a staff recommendation to change the bank’s internal flow to a full one-way pattern to limit some turning movements onto Newtown Road. Beecher and project engineer Benjamin Dodo opposed a full one-way pattern at the bank entrance, arguing it would force customers to exit and re-enter the site for routine bank business and that an internal two-way option better serves bank customers who may need to go inside after using the ATM or drive-through.
To reduce conflicts the applicant said it added traffic-calming measures (a painted center median), a "do not block" box at the shared west driveway, additional direction and "no through traffic" signage, a contiguous pedestrian connection between shopping centers and clarified retaining-wall cross sections. The team also modeled trip distribution and said in a conservative scenario the bank accounts for about 36% of peak-site trips; the fast-food element produces higher drive-through numbers in peak hours.
Commission Chair Arnold DiFenaldi Jr. asked the applicant to summarize their traffic rationale in writing in response to the city traffic-engineer memo so staff and commissioners can review the circulation tradeoffs. The commission voted to continue the matter to the March 5 meeting to allow the city traffic engineer to comment and for the applicant to submit the requested memo and any final traffic revisions.
Representative quotes: "The bank will generate just 466 trips per day," Attorney Tom Beecher said, citing the trip-generation table used for the application. "We added a lot more signage… 'no through traffic' and 'employee parking only'," engineer Benjamin Dodo said, describing plan revisions meant to reduce unwanted cut-through traffic. "I'd like to see it in writing," Chair DiFenaldi said when requesting a succinct written response to the city's traffic memo.
Ending: The commission continued the Newtown Road hearing to March 5, 2025, and asked the applicant to provide a written memo addressing the city traffic engineer's recommendations and final traffic drawings for staff review.
