Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Speed Cameras And Noise Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Police chief outlines speed-camera pilot, proposes tiered noise fines and requests appropriation

Middletown Common Council · August 26, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The police chief presented an automated speed-camera pilot with proposed locations and data safeguards, recommended a three-tier noise-ordinance fine structure, and asked the council to approve a $174,166.27 appropriation to cover overtime and related overages.

Police Chief (S5) briefed the council on multiple public-safety initiatives, asking the body to consider a pilot for automated speed-camera enforcement and proposing updates to the city’s noise ordinance.

On speed cameras, the chief presented sample ticket layouts and described system capabilities: directionality, radar or light-speed detection, GPS location for each violation and vendor-hosted cloud storage. He said the vendor-hosted cloud is a government cloud with encryption and that footage and identifying data would be accessible only to sworn law enforcement and authorized appeal-administrators, not linked to the 911 dispatch emergency-camera systems.

The chief proposed initial priority locations that would undergo engineering review, naming Randolph Road, Main Street/Washington Street, and school-zone approaches near Moody School and Spencer School as candidates. He described two vendor models: leased systems where vendors maintain equipment, and purchase models allowing city-owned hardware that could be repurposed if the program ends. He said vendors typically provide a back-end service (mailing, ticket processing) for a service fee and that an appeals hearing officer would handle disputes.

“Signage is required, on both sides of the camera,” the chief said, noting cameras can be set to give warnings at low thresholds and tickets at higher thresholds depending on council direction. Council members asked about calibration, data access, and whether the system affects insurance or license points; the chief said automated camera violations generally do not add motor-vehicle points and that for residents the city’s collection processes differ for nonresidents.

On noise enforcement, the chief and the commission recommended a three-tier fine structure with graduated penalties (examples given were $100 for a basic violation, $250 for mid-level, and up to $500 for repeat or severe violations). The council agreed to amend the noise-ordinance fine schedule to a tiered model and voted in favor of the amendment.

Budget: the police chief requested an appropriation of $174,166.27 to cover overtime and costs driven by special events, repair bills and replacement overtime; he explained private-duty overtime is budgeted and largely offset by private-duty revenue. The council moved and voted to approve the requested appropriation.

The chief said any ordinance and camera contract would go to general counsel for review and that staff would return with engineering studies and more precise vendor cost estimates before any camera deployment.