Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Project And Rebates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sharpsburg suspends local well project after MDE review; leftover COVID-relief funds returned to residents
Summary
The town ceased efforts to develop a new Sharpsburg potable water source after Maryland Department of the Environment said the drilled site would be classified "under the influence" of surface water, requiring costly treatment. Council voted to allocate leftover COVID-relief funds to issue a second $130 rebate to residents, bringing total issued rebates to $97,296.16.
Sharpsburg officials reported at the June 2 meeting that the town is suspending activities to develop a local potable water source after drilling did not yield potable water and Maryland Department of the Environment indicated produced water would be considered "under the influence" of surface water.
Mayor Russell Weaver summarized the history and technical findings: a previous recommendation to pursue a town source led to drilling to 300 feet, but the geology (karst formations) and comparisons to a Boonsboro well (which tested "under the influence") led MDE to conclude a treatment plant would be required. Officials said surface-water treatment plants are expensive, require more space and staff than Sharpsburg has available, and MDE is unlikely to fund another plant where one already exists.
Financials and resident rebates: the town reported its share of the drilling project was initially estimated at $53,148.00 but closed at $22,697.57. Two balances of COVID-relief funds — $30,450.43 and $6,015.73 — that could not be used for a proposed pond dock were voted by the Mayor and Council to be returned to residents as a second water rebate of $130 per resident. The minutes record an earlier rebate of $60,830.00; combining that earlier payment with these second-rebate funds produces a total of $97,296.16 issued to residents under the COVID-relief program, as recorded in the minutes.
Why it matters: suspending the project halts any near-term prospect of a town-owned potable source and confirms the town will continue relying on existing water supplies and treatment. Returning leftover COVID-relief funds as rebates directly sends those resources back to residents.
What's next: the minutes do not indicate further action on locating alternative water sources or exact timelines for disbursement logistics beyond the council's vote to allocate the funds as a second $130 rebate.
