Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County presents a countywide housing plan; staff urge exploring a new general obligation bond and other local funding tools

Alameda County Board of Supervisors · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff presented a countywide housing plan that estimates a need for tens of thousands of affordable units and discusses funding options including a potential county general obligation bond, transfer taxes, and EIFDs; supervisors asked staff to take the plan to the Health committee for deeper review.

Community Development Agency Director Sandy Rivera and Housing Director Michelle Starett presented a countywide housing plan that aggregates municipal housing needs and sets near‑term and long‑term goals. Starett said the county needs about 17,000 units to address shortfalls identified in the county's Home Together plan, while a broader 10–15 year target for an affordable housing ecosystem could be roughly 20,000 units; staff estimated a local subsidy need of about $3.8 billion to realize that goal.

The presentation reviewed a range of local funding options: renewing a county general obligation bond (a successor to Measure A1), exploring city‑level transfer taxes or vacancy taxes, and considering tools such as enhanced infrastructure financing districts. Starett told supervisors a regional housing bond that had been under discussion would have delivered about $2 billion to Alameda County had it advanced.

Supervisors asked staff to report back with more analysis, including readiness of pipeline projects, which cities are contributing matching funds and which local funding tools would be most productive. Multiple public commenters including developers and nonprofit housing providers urged the county to move quickly on funding and to prioritize "ready‑to‑launch" projects that could be brought into construction with local subsidy. Several supervisors expressed support for studying a new county general obligation bond and asked for a deeper dive in the Health committee.