Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Streetlighting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Resident asks Auburn to review new white LED streetlights, citing glare and sleep impacts

Auburn City Council · June 22, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Sky Ridge resident asked Auburn council to refer a review of recently installed bright white LED streetlights to staff, urging shielded, warm-colored fixtures and clear specifications for contractors; Public Works and the city manager said poles are PG&E-owned and staff will pursue discussions with the utility.

At public comment during the June 22 council meeting, Adam Torella, a resident of the Sky Ridge neighborhood, requested the council refer a review of recent streetlight replacements after his neighborhood received bright white LED fixtures that he said cause glare and light spill into homes.

Torella said the previous amber lights were softer and better suited to residential areas and asked staff to review fixture specifications, color temperature, lumen output and shielding and to consider requiring warm, shielded residential lighting from contractors or utilities. He cited guidance from the American Medical Association and lighting bodies about minimizing blue‑rich light and noted research linking greater nighttime light exposure to health risks.

"I'm not opposed to street lighting for public safety. I'm just asking, that responsible, lighting being warm color temperature, proper shielding, lower brightness where appropriate and clear specifications for any contractors or utility providers performing this work," Torella said.

Public Works Director Mitchell Dean and City Manager John Rebe responded that the poles and many fixtures are owned by PG&E, limiting the city's direct control, and that staff are working with the utility's public affairs team. Rebe suggested council action or a petition could be helpful, and staff said they would continue outreach and try to identify standard specifications that could be requested of PG&E or contractors.

No formal action was taken; Torella asked the council to refer the issue to public works or engineering and to consider placing it on a future agenda if necessary.