Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Rule topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board moves to implement remote public comment under state law despite member concerns
Summary
Following debate about opening remote public comment to non-constituents, the board approved steps to comply with a Brown Act amendment (SB 707) and directed the clerk to implement a system prioritizing in-person speakers and ADA accommodations while allowing electronic callers.
The board debated amendments to its rules to conform with a state law requiring remote public comment. Chair Walton and Supervisor Sherrill criticized the mandate, warning that unrestricted remote access could drown out local voices and invite disruptive callers.
Deputy City Attorney Brett Russi told the board the direction comes from "Senate Bill 707" amending the Brown Act and that failing to provide remote access could expose the city to litigation and injunctions. "A member of the public who tried to call into a meeting and did not have that ability could bring a claim under the Brown Act," he said. (Deputy City Attorney Brett Russi)
Madam Clerk Angela Calvillo outlined an implementation approach: accept in-person speakers first, permit advance sign-up for remote callers, prioritize ADA accommodations, and incorporate language-access planning. The clerk said callers who sign up in advance will be piped into the meeting in order; staff will provide redirections if comments fall outside board jurisdiction. (Angela Calvillo)
Despite strong reservations about cost and potential abuse, the board voted to proceed with the rule changes and implementation planning. Members said they will continue to work with counsel on definitions of disruption and possible future rule refinements.
