Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Media topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City staff seeks upgrade to public-access channel to enable streaming, captioning and searchable archives

City of Green Council Committees · August 13, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A telecommunications resolution would replace cable-access hardware to allow web streaming, remote management and ADA‑compatible captioning; staff reported three quotes under the board recommendation and committee requested Exhibit A and additional documentation before advancing.

City staff presented Resolution 2024‑R50 to update hardware that operates the City of Green’s public‑access (PEG) channel, arguing the upgrade would enable live web streaming, remote control of the broadcast, searchable archives and compatibility with captioning standards required by 2027.

Kevin Gilmette, the city’s digital media specialist, told the committee the current PEG channel runs via Spectrum cable and cannot be streamed directly. "So the only way that our residents can access it is by having a subscription or payment to Spectrum," he said, adding the new hardware (vendor demos from Cablecast) allows web channels, remote uploading and 20 terabytes of hosted content for on‑demand viewing.

Gilmette said the telecommunications board recommended up to $60,000 for the project; quotes returned slightly under that total and below the $75,000 threshold that would trigger public bidding. Committee members asked about outreach to community groups, criteria for content, and whether the channel could host school and sports programming; Gilmette said the city would create a web page with submission guidelines and that most comparable cities offer three channels (public, education, government).

Ending: The committee did not vote for immediate passage; members asked staff to provide Exhibit A and follow-up materials and moved the item for a second reading at a future meeting.