Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preexisting Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hopatcong board certifies preexisting lower-level unit for family use with safety conditions
Summary
The Hopatcong Planning Board approved certification that a lower-level garage-unit is a preexisting nonconforming family-use unit, conditioned on a fire marshal inspection, subcode permitting as needed, deed restriction forbidding rental and an engineering limit on parking above the space.
Get email alerts on the Preexisting Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hopatcong Planning Board on July 7 certified a lower-level unit as a preexisting nonconforming family-use unit, but imposed safety and use limits after hearing testimony and neighbor recollections.
The applicant told the board the space beneath the garage has a sink and new tiles and would be used only by family and guests, not as an independent rental. Neighbor James Betts, sworn as a witness, said he observed people “in and out of that lower unit” in the 1970s and described it as a single-room kitchen with a small bathroom that “pretty much look[ed] the way it still looks the same.”
Board members pressed for safety assurances before authorizing sleeping in the space. A member proposed requiring at minimum a fire-marshall inspection and any necessary plumbing or electrical subcode permits; other members recommended a deed restriction to prohibit rental and an engineering review or deed prohibition against parking on the upper level unless an engineer signs off.
The board voted to approve the certification of a preexisting nonconforming use limited to family members and guests and subject to three conditions: a fire marshals' inspection at a minimum (and any required subcode permitting), a deed restriction forbidding use as a rental or short-term rental, and a limitation that no vehicles be parked on the upper level unless an engineering assessment confirms it is safe. The motion passed on roll call with the members present voting in favor.
The approval does not authorize the unit as an independent dwelling or commercial rental; the board clarified that bringing the unit up to code if required remains the applicant’s responsibility. The applicant was advised to coordinate the inspections and to record the deed restriction as part of the approval.

